Judicial

#62025CO0566Mahkeme Kararı (Sekizinci Daire) 12 Mart 2026. FF - Avrupa Birliği Ceza Adaleti İşbirliği Ajansı ve Avrupa Birliği Hukuk Uygulama İşbirliği Ajansı aleyhine. Temyiz – Adalet Divanı Usul Kuralları Madde 181 – Üye Devletlerin polis makamları ve diğer güvenlik kuruluşlarının işbirliği – TFEU Madde 340 – Yönetmelik (AB) 2016/794 – Madde 50(1) – Avrupa Birliği Hukuk Uygulama İşbirliği Ajansı'nın (Europol) sözleşme dışı sorumluluğu – Ulusal makamlarca Europol'e iletilen kişisel verilerin hukuka aykırı işlendiği iddiası – İddia edilen zararın gerçekliği – Temyiz kısmen açıkça kabul edilemez ve kısmen açıkça asılsız. Dava C-566/25 P.

🇪🇺European Union··Other·Medium Impact·View source ↗

AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. See the original source for the authoritative text.

🇬🇧 English

The court ruled on an appeal involving the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) regarding claims of improper handling of personal data from national authorities. The appeal was mostly rejected as either not allowed or lacking merit. This decision affects individuals whose data was processed by Europol and the national authorities involved.

AI-generated summary. May contain errors. Refer to official sources for legal decisions.

Key Changes

  • The appeal was found to be partly inadmissible.
  • The court deemed part of the appeal to be unfounded.
  • The ruling clarifies Europol's responsibilities regarding data processing.

Affected Parties

Individuals whose data was processed by EuropolNational authorities that transmitted data to Europol

Tags

Europol,data protection,court ruling…

More from European Union

EU Trade Mark Decision: Green Asset vs. EUIPO

General Court Decision on Inadmissibility of Access Info Europe v European Commission

Directive (EU) 2026/799 harmonising certain aspects of insolvency law