Civil & Administrative

#JUSB1101296AOrder of January 25, 2011, regarding the professional interview and recognition of the professional value of chief clerks and clerks of the judicial services of the Ministry of Justice and Liberties

🇫🇷France··Other·Medium Impact·View source ↗

AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. See the original source for the authoritative text.

🇬🇧 English

This regulation mandates annual professional interviews for chief clerks and judicial clerks within the French Ministry of Justice. The interview process evaluates the clerks' professional skills, career perspectives, and training needs, aiming to enhance transparency and recognition of their contributions. The law impacts clerks' career advancement by adjusting seniority based on performance evaluations.

AI-generated summary. May contain errors. Refer to official sources for legal decisions.

Key Changes

  • Annual professional interviews for clerks
  • Performance evaluations affecting career advancement and seniority
  • Recognition of professional contributions

Obligations

What this law requires

high

Conduct annual professional interviews for all chief clerks and judicial clerks within the Ministry of Justice and Liberties

Ministry of Justice and Liberties, supervisory hierarchical authorities
operational
high

Provide written notice to clerks of the interview date at least 10 days in advance, accompanied by a description of functions exercised

Direct hierarchical supervisors
operational
medium

Conduct professional interviews exclusively by the direct hierarchical superior; if another supervisor must conduct the interview due to major reasons, explicitly document this in the report

Direct hierarchical supervisors
operational
high

Document interview reports with required content including date, agent identity, grade, step, function description, evaluation criteria ratings, agent observations on career perspectives and training needs, and communication/notification dates

Direct hierarchical supervisors
reporting
high

Evaluate clerks using six-level rating scale (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Average, Insufficient, Very Insufficient) across four criterion groups: professional competence, professional aptitudes/effectiveness, relational qualities, and management capacities

Direct hierarchical supervisors
operational

Affected Parties

Chief clerksJudicial clerks of the Ministry of Justice

Tags

professional development,judicial services,public administration