Judicial

#2026/204Şartlı Tahliye Kurulu (Değişiklik) (No. 2) Kuralları 2026

🇬🇧United Kingdom··Statutory Instrument·Medium Impact·View source ↗

AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. See the original source for the authoritative text.

🇬🇧 English

The Parole Board has changed a rule that used to suggest they would usually make decisions based on written documents. Now, they can choose to hold a face-to-face hearing if there are special reasons to do so. This change affects parole applicants and the board members who review their cases.

AI-generated summary. May contain errors. Refer to official sources for legal decisions.

Key Changes

  • Removed the presumption for decisions to be made on papers
  • Allows for oral hearings in exceptional circumstances
  • Gives more discretion to the panel in decision-making

Obligations

What this law requires

high

Parole Board panels must consider whether exceptional circumstances exist that would justify directing a case to an oral hearing, rather than making a decision based on written documents alone

Parole Board panels
operational
high

Parole Board panels must have the discretion to direct a case to an oral (face-to-face) hearing when exceptional circumstances are identified

Parole Board panels
operational
medium

Remove the previous presumption that cases should be decided on written documents (paragraph 1ZA of rule 19 is removed)

Parole Board
operational

Affected Parties

Parole applicantsParole Board members

Tags

parole,legal process,hearings