Environment

#62022CJ0379Mahkemenin (Beşinci Daire) 26 Şubat 2026 tarihli kararı. Singapore Airlines Ltd ve Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd, Avrupa Komisyonu aleyhine. İtiraz – Rekabet – Anlaşmalar, kararlar ve uyumlu eylemler – Hava kargo piyasası – Avrupa Komisyonu'nun, TFEU'nun 101. Maddesi, Avrupa Ekonomik Alanı Anlaşması'nın 53. Maddesi ve Avrupa Topluluğu ile İsviçre Konfederasyonu arasında hava taşımacılığına ilişkin Anlaşma'nın 8. Maddesi ihlalini tespit eden kararı – Hava kargo hizmetlerinin fiyat öğelerinin koordinasyonu (yakıt ek ücreti, güvenlik ek ücreti ve ek ücretler üzerinden komisyon ödemeyi reddetme) – Gelen kargo hizmetleri – Komisyonun bölgesel yetkisi – Nitelikli etkiler – Tek ve sürekli ihlal – Ticari bir ittifak çerçevesinde benimsenen davranış – Hesaba alınan – Tüzük (EC) No 1/2003 – Madde 25 – Komisyonun cezai yaptırımlar uygulama yetkisinin zamanaşımı süresi – Zamanaşımı süresine dayalı savunma – Kamu politikasıyla ilgili bir konuyu içeren savunma. Dava C-379/22 P.

🇪🇺European Union··Other·Low Impact·View source ↗

AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. See the original source for the authoritative text.

🇬🇧 English

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Singapore Airlines Ltd and Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement – Conduct adopted in the context of a commercial alliance – Account taken – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 25 – Limitation period for the Commission’s powers to impose penalties – Plea based on the limitation period – Plea involving a mat

AI-generated summary. May contain errors. Refer to official sources for legal decisions.

Key Changes

  • Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Singapore Airlines Ltd and Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted

Affected Parties

Relevant public institutions

Tags

legislation