#09-38-25Decision on the Dispute Between M. B. and Enedis
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. See the original source for the authoritative text.
This decision pertains to the resolution of a dispute related to the cancellation of two solar energy connection requests that M. B. had with Enedis. M. B. claims the requests were removed without his consent, while Enedis maintains the cancellation was authorized by M. B.'s representative, Clef Energies. Ultimately, the decision rejects M. B.'s request to reinstate the projects, emphasizing that Enedis's belief in Clef Energies' authority was legitimate.
AI-generated summary. May contain errors. Refer to official sources for legal decisions.
Key Changes
- Rejection of M. B.'s request to reinstate the solar projects
- Recognition of Enedis's legitimate belief in Clef Energies' authority
- Decision suggesting M. B. may take legal action against his initial representative
Obligations
What this law requires
Network distribution managers must verify the mandate/authority of representatives before processing requests to cancel or modify connection applications, particularly when there is evidence of doubt regarding the principal's consent
Network distribution managers must obtain written confirmation of the principal's agreement before executing cancellation requests for connection applications submitted through a representative
Network distribution managers must apply heightened diligence procedures when notified that a new representative has been designated for an applicant, before processing subsequent cancellation requests from the previous representative
Representatives of connection applicants must obtain written agreement from the principal before requesting cancellation or withdrawal of connection applications
Network distribution managers must maintain and follow documented procedures (such as PRO-RES_67 E) for processing connection application cancellations through representatives