Regulation Amending the Erciyes University Associate and Undergraduate Education-Teaching Regulation
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. See the original source for the authoritative text.
This regulation updates Article 19 of Erciyes University's main education regulation, specifically changing how raw success scores are calculated. For programs using a course-passing system, the raw success score is now calculated as 40% of the average of midterm exams plus 60% of the final or year-end exam score. Programs using a year-passing system may set their own weighting ratios, determined by the relevant academic units. Fractions are kept as-is during ratio calculations, but final raw success scores are rounded to the nearest whole number. While exams are generally written, departments may request and receive approval for alternative assessment methods such as oral exams, portfolios, projects, presentations, or peer evaluations. Such decisions must be announced to students at the beginning of the semester in the information form.
AI-generated summary. May contain errors. Refer to official sources for legal decisions.
Key Changes
- Raw success score calculation changed to 40% midterm average + 60% final exam for course-passing programs
- Year-passing programs can determine their own exam contribution ratios by academic units
- Fractions kept exactly in ratio calculations; raw success scores rounded to nearest whole number
+ 3 more changes with Pro
Obligations
What this law requires
For programs using a course-passing system, calculate raw success scores as 40% of the average of midterm exams plus 60% of the final or year-end exam score
For programs using a year-passing system, determine and establish the weighting ratios for midterm and final/year-end exam contributions through relevant academic units
Retain fractions as-is during ratio calculations, but round final raw success scores to the nearest whole number
Conduct exams in written format as the default assessment method
Submit requests to relevant academic councils for approval before implementing alternative assessment methods (oral exams, portfolios, projects, presentations, peer evaluations, etc.)