Amendment to the Regulation on Higher Education Quality Council Expertise
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. See the original source for the authoritative text.
The regulation changes how the Higher Education Quality Council recruits expert staff. The entrance exam can now be held as both a written and oral exam, or as an oral exam only, based on KPSS scores and the Council Presidency’s decision. Candidates face clearer selection rules. If both exams are used, only those who pass the written exam can move to the oral exam, and they need at least 70 out of 100 on the written part. Candidate caps, scoring, tie-break rules, and appeal procedures are also updated.
AI-generated summary. May contain errors. Refer to official sources for legal decisions.
Key Changes
- Allows the entrance exam to be organized as written plus oral, or oral only
- Sets a minimum written exam score of 70 out of 100 when a written exam is used
- Updates candidate caps, final score calculation, tie-break rules, and appeal finality
Obligations
What this law requires
The Council Presidency must determine whether the entrance examination will consist of both a written and an oral examination or only an oral examination, based on KPSS results.
Where the entrance examination includes both written and oral parts, candidates who do not pass the written examination must not be admitted to the oral examination.
Where the entrance examination includes both written and oral parts, the number of candidates invited to the written examination must not exceed twenty times the number of announced positions.
Where the entrance examination is conducted only as an oral examination, the number of candidates invited to the oral examination must not exceed four times the number of announced positions.
Candidates with KPSS scores equal to the last-ranked candidate invited to the entrance examination must also be invited to the entrance examination.