#ESRH1133537AOrder of December 29, 2011 on Jury Composition Rules and Expert Designation
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. See the original source for the authoritative text.
The law establishes the composition rules for juries and the designation of experts for competitions and professional examinations regarding the recruitment and advancement of engineers and technical research personnel within the French higher education ministry. It delineates specific requirements for jury members based on their competence and the ranking necessary to fill positions offered in various competitions. The law also abrogates several previous decrees and outlines the responsibilities for its execution.
AI-generated summary. May contain errors. Refer to official sources for legal decisions.
Key Changes
- Standardizes jury compositions for different categories of personnel
- Clarifies the criteria for selecting experts
- Abrogates previous regulations that outlined jury compositions and expert designations
Obligations
What this law requires
For Category A recruitment competitions, the admissibility jury must include the minister responsible for higher education (or representative) as president and minimum four members with technical/administrative competence and rank equal to or higher than positions offered
For Category A admissibility juries, at least three of the five members must be selected from the expert list for the relevant professional activity branch
All jury members for Category A competitions must be external to the establishments where positions are being filled
For Category A admission juries, minimum one of four members must be from the professional activity branch expert list and at least two must be external to the establishment or service
The minister responsible for higher education must designate experts for each professional activity branch with a minimum of three experts per branch based on proposals from rectors, vice-rectors, and establishment leaders