Civil & Administrative

OPM Withdraws Proposed Rule on Administrative Law Judge Appointments

🇺🇸United States··Proposed Rule·Medium Impact·View source ↗

AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. See the original source for the authoritative text.

🇬🇧 English

The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has formally withdrawn a proposed rule that was originally published on September 21, 2020. The proposed rule sought to revise OPM's regulations governing the appointment and employment of Administrative Law Judges (ALJs), who serve as independent adjudicators in federal agency proceedings. The withdrawal effectively cancels all proposed changes to ALJ appointment and employment procedures that were under consideration since 2020. No new regulations replacing the withdrawn proposal have been introduced as part of this action. This withdrawal signals a policy reversal, likely reflecting the current administration's different priorities regarding ALJ independence and federal civil service protections. ALJs will continue to operate under the existing regulatory framework that was in place before the 2020 proposal.

AI-generated summary. May contain errors. Refer to official sources for legal decisions.

Key Changes

  • OPM formally withdraws the proposed rule originally published on September 21, 2020
  • All proposed revisions to ALJ appointment and employment regulations are cancelled
  • No replacement rule or alternative proposal is introduced alongside the withdrawal

+ 2 more changes with Pro

Affected Parties

Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) employed across federal agenciesFederal agencies that rely on ALJs for adjudication (SSA, NLRB, SEC, EPA, etc.)+3 more…

Tags

administrative law judges,OPM,federal rulemaking withdrawal