Employment & Labor

#62024CA0633Dava C-633/24, Sovisso: Adalet Divanı’nın (Altıncı Daire) 22 Ocak 2026 tarihli kararı (Corte suprema di cassazione – İtalya’dan ön karar talebi) – F.F. vs Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) (Ön karar talebi – Sosyal güvenlik – Göçmen işçiler – Tüzük (EC) No 883/2004 – Eşit muamele – Dönemlerin birleştirilmesi – Madde 58 – Avrupa Topluluğu ve üye devletleri ile İsviçre Konfederasyonu arasında, diğer taraftan, serbest dolaşım anlaşması – Geçersizlik yardımları – Yasal asgari geçersizlik yardımı almak için ek yardım – Serbest dolaşım hakkını kullanmış işçiler için katkı dönemiyle ilgili daha sıkı koşullar)

🇪🇺European Union··Other·Medium Impact·View source ↗

AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. See the original source for the authoritative text.

🇬🇧 English

The case involves a ruling regarding the rights of migrant workers in the EU, specifically about their access to invalidity benefits. It clarifies that workers who move between EU countries and Switzerland should be treated equally when it comes to receiving these benefits, even if they have different contribution periods. This affects migrant workers who may face stricter conditions for receiving minimum invalidity benefits.

AI-generated summary. May contain errors. Refer to official sources for legal decisions.

Key Changes

  • Migrant workers will have equal access to invalidity benefits regardless of their contribution history.
  • Stricter conditions for receiving benefits are challenged for those exercising free movement rights.
  • The ruling emphasizes the importance of equal treatment in social security for migrant workers.

Affected Parties

Migrant workersSocial security institutions

Tags

migrant workers,invalidity benefits,EU law