Employment & Labor

#62024CJ0633Mahkemenin (Altıncı Daire) 22 Ocak 2026 tarihli Kararı. F.F. v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS). Corte suprema di cassazione'dan ön karar talebi. Ön karar talepleri – Sosyal güvenlik – Göçmen işçiler – Tüzük (EC) No 883/2004 – Eşit muamele – Dönemlerin birleştirilmesi – Madde 58 – Avrupa Topluluğu ve üye devletleriyle bir taraf, ve diğer tarafla İsviçre Konfederasyonu arasında kişilerin serbest dolaşımı üzerine anlaşma – Sakatlık yardımları – Yasal asgari sakatlık desteğinin alınmasını sağlamak için ek – Hareketlilik hakkını kullanan işçiler için katkı dönemi ile ilgili daha katı koşullar. Dava C-633/24.

🇪🇺European Union··Other·Medium Impact·View source ↗

AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. See the original source for the authoritative text.

🇬🇧 English

This court ruling addresses the rights of migrant workers in relation to social security benefits, specifically invalidity benefits. It emphasizes that these workers should be treated equally and have their contribution periods aggregated, even if they have moved between countries in the EU and Switzerland. This affects migrant workers who may face stricter conditions for receiving benefits due to their mobility.

AI-generated summary. May contain errors. Refer to official sources for legal decisions.

Key Changes

  • Migrant workers will have their contribution periods combined for benefit eligibility.
  • Stricter conditions for invalidity benefits for mobile workers are challenged.
  • Equal treatment for migrant workers in social security matters is reinforced.

Affected Parties

Migrant workersSocial security institutions

Tags

migrant workers,social security,invalidity benefits…

More from European Union

Rates for Currency Conversion for Social Security of Migrant Workers

EU Court Ruling on Fixed-Term Employment Contracts in Public Sector

Court Ruling on Abuse of Fixed-Term Contracts in Public Sector