#2003-532Decree No. 2003-532 Regarding the Establishment and Use of Complementary Admission Lists for Public Service Competitions
AI-generated summary for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. See the original source for the authoritative text.
This law establishes the framework for the creation and use of complementary admission lists for public service competitions in France. It mandates that a jury must create a merit-based list of candidates deemed suitable for filling available positions. It limits the number of candidates that can be appointed from these lists to 200% of the available positions, with specific rules governing how positions are defined and allocated, including provisions for filling vacancies between competitions.
AI-generated summary. May contain errors. Refer to official sources for legal decisions.
Key Changes
- Introduction of a merit-based complementary list for candidates in public service competitions.
- Limitation on the number of appointments from the complementary list set at 200% of available positions.
- Flexibility in using complementary list candidates to fill vacancies between competitions.
Obligations
What this law requires
For each public service competition, the jury must establish a merit-based complementary admission list containing all candidates deemed suitable to fill the available positions.
Limit the total number of appointments from complementary admission lists to a maximum of 200% of the number of positions offered in the competition, unless a derogation is granted by decree countersigned by the minister responsible for civil service.
Define the number of positions offered at a competition as the number fixed on the date of the first examination or, for competitions with document review, the date of the first jury meeting, plus reserved positions and positions carried over from other unprovided competitions.
When filling vacancies between competitions using complementary lists, respect the proportions resulting from the decree fixing the number and distribution of positions across external, internal, and other competitions.
Assign candidates from complementary admission lists in order of merit as established by the jury, without the obligation to revise assignments already made when appointments are based on ranking and placement preferences.